This is where you find out whether the thing you built holds up. Strangers vote, and the reasons come with the verdict.
Slop doesn’t mean “made with AI”. Plenty of AI-assisted work is excellent, and plenty of hand-written software is landfill. Here it means something narrower: work made without judgement. Nobody decided what it was for. Nobody looked at what came out and thought it could be better.
If you want somewhere to sneer at people for using a model, the rest of the internet is right there.
No account, no email, nothing to approve. You get one vote per project, and you can change it whenever you like.
Votes are tied to your browser, not an identity. That isn’t fraud-proof — it stops the ordinary accidents: double taps, refreshes, the tab you left open for a week.
Fix a clumsy tagline, add the detail you forgot, repair a broken link. A bad description is a bad reason to be called slop. Editing never resets the votes, and the page says when a listing last changed.
The address is fixed from the moment you submit, so no link anyone shared ever dies. At five votes the domain locks too — a submission shouldn’t collect a verdict as one app and then turn into another.
A raw percentage lies when the sample is small. One vote, one thumbs up, and that’s 100% — ahead of the project that convinced 480 people out of 500.
So the ranking asks a different question: given these votes, how low could the real approval be? That’s the Wilson lower bound, and it’s what sorts the Top board. Volume is evidence, so volume moves you up. There’s no thumb on the scale.
| Votes | Raw approval | Wilson floor | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 of 1 | 100% | 20.7% | 4 |
| 480 of 500 | 96% | 93.9% | 1 |
| 47 of 50 | 94% | 83.8% | 2 |
| 9 of 10 | 90% | 59.6% | 3 |
Nothing gets a verdict label under five votes — a confident stamp on a sample of two is the hollow signal this site was built to replace. Past five, the label follows the share who called it good:
A score alone gives a creator nothing to act on. “68% called it slop” is a bad afternoon. “68% called it slop, and forty of them tapped Generic template” is a redesign brief.
So a verdict can carry up to six one-tap reasons. They’re short and blunt on purpose — hand people a free-text box and you get a comment section. Reasons are optional, and they’re the only part of a verdict anyone remembers.
There’s no moderation queue and no reputation system. The site works because most people behave.
That’s the whole mechanism. The rest is opinions.